Filing Tax Return after the Deadline May Lead to Bankruptcy Trap

I hope you enjoy reading this blog post. If you want to hire a bankruptcy lawyer, click here.
Suspense Accounts
Table of Contents

A troubling trend has now turned into a full-blown minority opinion in the bankruptcy world. Some bankruptcy and appellate courts are reading the Federal Bankruptcy Code to exclude late-filed tax returns from the definition of a “tax return.”

It has long been held that recent income tax debts are not dischargeable in bankruptcy, but older tax debts (that otherwise qualify under the Bankruptcy Code) may be discharged. Some courts, including the First, Fifth, and Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, now find that changes to the Bankruptcy Code in 2005 exclude certain late-filed returns from discharge. These courts point to a “hanging paragraph” located at the end of Section 523(a) which defines a “return” as a tax filing “that satisfies the requirements of applicable nonbankruptcy law (including applicable filing requirements).” That paragraph specifies that returns filed by the IRS with debtor cooperation under 6020(a) are “returns,” but those filed by the IRS without debtor cooperation under 6020(b) are not.

Recently the First Circuit in the case of In re Fahey, — F.3d — (1st Cir. Feb. 18, 2015), joined other courts in finding that “applicable filing requirements” includes meeting the tax filing deadline. In other words, a late filed return, even by as little as one day past the deadline, is not a “return” and is therefore not a dischargeable debt in either Chapter 7 or Chapter 13.

The First Circuit joins the Fifth Circuit (McCoy v. Mississippi State Tax Comm’n, 666 F.3d 924 (5th Cir. 2012)) and the Tenth Circuit (In re Mallo, 2014 WL 7360130 (10th Cir. Dec. 29, 2014)) in finding that the plain language of the Bankruptcy Code directs this interpretation. Basing its decision on plain language, the Fahey court found that a tax deadline is an “applicable filing requirement,” thereby rendering a return filed outside that time nondischargeable unless filed under 6020(a). The dissent in Fahey points out that permitting only late-filed returns under section 6020(a) absurdly rewards the tax debtor who sits on his hands and awaits IRS invitation to complete the return while punishing the debtor who voluntarily files his own return even one day late.

About the Author
George Haines

George Haines is the Owner and Managing Attorney of Freedom Law Firm in Las Vegas, Nevada. For over two decades, he has helped thousands of individuals and families overcome debt through bankruptcy, foreclosure defense, loan modifications, and consumer protection cases. Licensed in Nevada, New York, and New Jersey, George guided Nevadans through the Great Recession and COVID-19 era, earning a reputation for practical strategies that save homes, protect wages, and provide fresh starts.

Before founding Freedom Law Firm, he co-founded one of Nevada’s most recognized consumer law practices. He is an active member of the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys, the American Bankruptcy Institute, and other leading organizations, reflecting his commitment to excellence and consumer advocacy.

George Haines

Owner and Managing Attorney

you also might be interested in

Our Locations

8985 S Eastern Ave Suite 100 Las Vegas, NV 89123
1180 N. Town Center Dr., Suite 100 Las Vegas, NV 89144​
8985 S Eastern Ave Suite 100 Las Vegas, NV 89123
Schedule Today!

    Free Consultation

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.